Do Academics of Iranica agree with Lendering?

 

Lendering demands the following from Farrokh’s publishers:

“…the manuscript ought to have been returned to the writer.”

He also states the following:

“…hundreds of errorsShadows in the Desert remains, in four words, an extremely bad book… useless... Someone with a Ph.D. and employed by a university ought to know better

These statements are not supported by serious academic scholars in the domain of Iranian Studies. Below are a number of examples displayed on Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/Shadows-Desert-Ancient-General-Military/dp/1846031087/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1222664345&sr=1-1

"This is an excellent well-illustrated survey of an important period, useful for students and a general readership alike. It deals not only with military matters, but also more broadly with political developments in Persia. My students have consulted it with profit."

Professor Geoffrey Greatrex

Department of Classics and Religious Studies

University of Ottawa

"Shadows in the Desert: Ancient Persia at War is perhaps on of the finest books that has been produced from Western publishing houses, in this case Osprey Publishing... For the first time, we see a clearly written history book that outlines the relationship between these Iranian achievements to the wars that took place between the Greco-Roman world and ancient Persia...this book draws on excellent research that has received little mention; not to mention previously un-translated Greco-Roman historical sources."

Professor Nikoloz Kacharava, MD, PhD.

The University of Georgia in Tbilisi

Member of Academy of Sciences in Georgia, Active Member of New York Academy of Sciences

"This beautifully illustrated book will no doubt serve as a useful companion for all those interested in the military history of the pre-Islamic Middle East... Useful maps, photography and color plates make this a handsome and desirable volume; it will be of interest to students and scholars alike."

Professor Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones

School of History, Classics and Archaeology

University of Edinburgh

"... a book for all who have ever been curious about the 'other' view on Persia, not from the Western standpoint rooted in Greece, but from the traditions of the Persians themselves... Meticulously researched and documented... I have recommended it to many and am also using it here at Stanford not only for research but also in a course this fall. There is not only no better book on Persian warfare, it is carefully and sensitively written with great verve and love of history. I much appreciate how the research and analyses of texts showed Achaeminid, Parthian and Sassanid military accomplishments, often to the astonishment of Greeks and Romans and beyond. I notice from excellent reviews that other scholars agree.”

Professor Patrick Hunt

Department of Classics

Stanford University

Lendering has chosen to challenge the judgement of not only the colossus of Iranica, Professor Richard Nelson Frye, but other world-class scholars who have read and reviewed Farrokh’s text with an objective academic eye.

 

Perhaps Lendering is suggesting that his unique perspective is superior to the combined scholarship of world-class scholars from venues such as Harvard University, Stanford University, University of Ottawa and the University of Edinburgh, etc. The most restrained observation with respect to Lendering’s views is that they are inconsistent.